quislet: (Default)
[personal profile] quislet
So after the better part of a day in the Vatican museum, my entire brain reduced to gelatin from miles of sacred paintings, pagan sculpture, 20th century religious art (including a very Voldemortian sculpture of Pope Gutless Bastard I), we make our way back around 1/4 of the outer wall of the Vatican to St. Peter's.  There's been Michelangelo everywhere, including the Pieta that assaults you just inside the gift shop at the painting gallery.  There's Michelangelo fashion on the Swiss guard, Michelangelo architecture just across town above the Imperial forum, and the way-too-much-to-take-in Michelangelo painting of the Sistine Chapel.

Just inside St. Peter's, to the right, is the real thing, the Pieta.  Regardless of how numb the brain is, it's simply breathtaking.  I take in as much as I can hold, and just wander around the basilica from right to back to left, finding statues of so many popes that I'm left feeling very inadequate in Roman Catholic history, post-Protestant as I am.  I found Gutless Bastard I again (Pius XII), just opposite Popeman (Pius XI). It was nice to find VIII and his nephew, Antonio Cardinal Barberini, too, as they both figure heavily into the Roman branch of the 1632 series I've been reading.

There was a marvelous angel of death sculpture back by the tomb of Leo XI, with billowing folds of pink marble piled atop the great bronze winged skeleton and his hourglass.  There's so much amazing sculpture throughout St. Peter's that you'd miss him if you weren't looking for him.

But the most amazing thing was the creche.  There is an honest-to-goodness plastic light-up creche scene in St. Peter's right now, looking like it came off a lawn in Miami.  There's nothing classy or artistic about it, other than a distinct lack of blinky lights.  It would almost be improved by a pair of plastic flamingoes.  How does something like that end up as the counterpoint to the Pieta?  I don't understand.

Oh, and why isn't there a cool sculpture of John Paul II?

Date: 2008-02-20 05:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyroguysr.livejournal.com
Ahhh... but did you figure out which one was the FEMALE Pope??? *grins*

Date: 2008-02-21 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quislet.livejournal.com
There were a couple of statues that looked vaguely feminine...the question definitely came to mind.

Date: 2008-02-20 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skivee.livejournal.com
If that is the creche that they showed during the "A Latenight Christmas Extravaganza Live From The Vatican In 3-D" that I saw this past Christmas eve, then your assessment is spot on.

Date: 2008-02-21 02:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quislet.livejournal.com
That explains it then! I didn't bring my 3-D glasses. I'll bet it looked way more Michelangelonical in red and green. Or maybe if I just squinted and let my eyes de-focus.

Say, didn't Dan Brown write a book about that?

Date: 2008-02-21 07:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skivee.livejournal.com
Well, during the program, the announcer was just GUSHING about how wonderful the figures were, and how meaningful the experience was , and how wonderful it was that various communities had contributed various figures.
I thought they looked tacky.

Profile

quislet: (Default)
quislet

January 2019

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 18th, 2026 04:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios